ERIC HOLDER HAS A UNIQUE CONCEPT OF ACCOUNTABILITY

Not only does the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of POTUS' Administration not know what his department is doing, or when it is doing it, or how it is doing it, but more than two (2) years after the ATF's actions lead to the death of a border patrol agent, he still hasn't bothered to figure it out... To top it off, not one single person has been disciplined for Operation Fast & Furious. Not. One.

Attorney General Eric Holder recently testified that there were some "changes" made but no... no discipline for the death of a U.S. citizen. Two years after the fact. Nothing.

Here are his words, as if the term "as yet" indicates justice will be done... more than two years later. Maybe even three years later? Or ten? How long until we actually discipline someone Mr. Holder?

"No I have not as yet -- as yet," Holder said when questioned by Issa on the matter. "There have been personnel changes made at ATF. We obviously have a new U.S. attorney in Arizona. We have made personnel switches at ATF. People have been moved out of positions."

Very true, some people were moved, and then Mr. Holder praised them for their good work. What a peculiar sense of accountability he must have. A man died and two years after the fact NO-ONE has been disciplined for the program that directly contributed to Brian Terry's death. And yet, somehow, Holder believes he is competent in the administration of his office.

Holder Did Know About Gun Runner, Fast & Furious Program

Attorney General and Supreme U.S. Lawyer, Eric Holder, testified (UNDER OATH) that he wasn't really sure when he heard about the Fast and Furious, Gun Runner Project, but believes he heard about it recently. Like, in the past few weeks.

Turns out, it was actually back in July of 2010 and we can prove it (and may have been even earlier as documents are still coming to light). So before anyone was killed, he knew. Other high-ups discussed the project and actually had the incredible depth of stupidity to think that the American public would think allowing guns into the hands of violent criminals was a good idea. Let me clear it up in case there is any future doubt: We do NOT think it is a good idea. What about a buy/bust operation? Maybe. That's a significantly different scenario. However, allowing thousands of guns to "walk" into Mexico without any real supervision or follow up... gee, that seems... let's say, "un-smart." I mean it could get someone killed couldn't it? When its all said and done, ask yourself this question: Why is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States of America testifying inaccurately about the biggest issue of his career? Did the facts just slip his mind? Did he not prepare for the hearing? I thought an attorney's entire job was to be over-prepared.

In the meantime, Supreme Big Sister, Janet The Mighty Napolitano, is telling us that American Citizens are the source of weapons in Mexico (while ignoring internal cables which actually show the majority come from south America where they are cheaper, easier to purchase in bulk and involve less attention by government... but we should ignore that. I mean Mexican gangs just love that "Made in Romania / China But Bought Through The USA" stamp don't they? I'd pay a premium for that stamp, wouldn't you?).

You Paid To Kill A Border Agent

Well, kind of.

Recently discovered documents prove that U.S. Officials within the D.O.J. not only knew about project "Fast and Furious" (the gun runner project where we gave weapons to criminals, lost track of them and later allowed them to lead to the death of border patrol agents) but actually used your tax dollars to buy the guns. And it wasn't like we just watched a few stores sell guns and did nothing about it, we actually bought more than $1 Million in weapons and sold them directly to drug cartels / illegal dealers. So in a way, you see, you contributed directly to the death of a U.S. Border Patrol Agent with your tax dollars. You should be ashamed of yourself. If you are, you would be the only person to acknowledge it. POTUS and the D.O.J. are still pretending like it was a small goof that no one really knew about.

Oh and the powers within BATFE tried to cover it up by transferring would be whistle blowers to "menial" jobs when they pointed out how stupid the decision was. Isn't that great?

***TSA UPDATES***

Here are a few stories that you will love concerning the quality individuals employed by the Transportation Security Administration:

One TSA Agent (a top dog in Mississippi) alleged stabbed another agent to death while yet another TSA Agent was arrested for statutory rape. (That means involving a minor people.) And of course, you heard about the three TSA agents who were arrested on drug charges stemming from a smuggling ring they were involved in (allegedly).

And let's not forget this guy. He also works for the TSA. David Anderson is charged with molesting a girl under the age of 14 after encouraging her to drink alcohol, watch pornography and do other things which I will not mention on this site (suffice it to say he is the reason I am tempted to support the death penalty).

So between BATFE and TSA, I have a lot of faith in government background screening and hiring practices.

ATF- Gun Runner Project Update

The head of the ATF (BATFE actually) who was in charge of overseeing project "Fast and Furious" where guns were given to violent criminals by the U.S. Government and not tracked, and which lead to the death of U.S. Custom's Border Agents who were actually trying to keep us safe... has "stepped down" as interim chief of the bureau. No he was not fired, no he was not "demoted." He simply elected to "step down" to a different division within BATFE. Guess what department he'll be in now? The Department of Legal Policy. That's not a joke.

How did the Attorney General react? You might suspect that he'd be upset. I mean Holder is the chief law enforcement guy in the Administration after all. Well if you did think that, you're wrong. Here's what Attorney General Holder had to say, personally, about Mr. Melson:

“As he moves into this new role, I want to thank Ken for his dedication to the department over the last three decades."

“Ken brings decades of experience at the department and extensive knowledge in forensic science to his new role, and I know he will be a valuable contributor on these issues...”

That's not a joke either.